About I Lagardien

I am a political economist interested in inequality; in the state of affairs and in the ideas, beliefs and policies that reproduce inequality between rich and poor

Photographs for Exhibition-Lecture Have Arrived

Shooting from the Hip from i lagardien on Vimeo.

By Ismail Lagardien

I have received the prints for the first lecture on photography and memory, focusing on a very specific time and space; the first weeks and months of the state of emergency in 1985 – 86. I am in discussion with a few people in departments of journalism, of visual studies, at least one research institution and an art and culture space about presenting a lecture and exhibition. It will be more of colloquim, as the lecture will be based on a paper that I started writing a while back….

The prints cost a small fortune, but it is well worth the price. They were hand printed by Denis da Silva at Silvertone International. I visited Silvertone’s darkrooms last week and felt like I had been transported back to the time when I worked as a news photographer – only it is much cooler and the technology is state of the art. It felt good to be back in a darkroom.

Anyway, I now need to have the pictures framed, and arrange a venue for the exhibit and lecture. The project is, actually, long-term. I may produce an essay, if I can get enough feedback. The lecture is not so much what is in the pictures – although it is important – as it is about the time when the pictures were taken. I explained my motivations in a previous post. The video, above, is a compilation of the prints that will be used in the exhibition-lecture.

It’s books, actual books, over e-readers (especially the iPad); anytime and every time.

Books

By Ismail Lagardien

I have just finished reading a book on my iPad. This was the first book I have read in its entirety on the device; I have mainly pdf documents on the iPad reader. I am not happy with the device. The iPad is bulky, not in a way that, say War and Peace is bulky. You can, at least, throw War and Peace in the back of the car without worrying that you will break it. The iPad is bulky, socially and technologically frustrating and just really useless as a device for reading and writing. Plus, once you buy one, you belong to Apple, as it were.

If we set aside our fascination with the gimmick; the novelty of a little tablet computer that can bring the world into our hands, virtually; a device that makes images look all shiny, colourful and bright; a corporate identity – walk into any store and you will easily recognise the brand – that makes us all, some of us, at least, feel as if we, ‘belong’ to a type of cult, or an exclusive club (neither of my Apple devices will ‘speak’ to my non-Apple devices), that is expensive and an acquiesced monopoly, to boot….

At least where books are concerned, the iPad is a type of techno cultural disease that threatens an important part of my life; reading, books, bookshops, borrowing and lending of books, annotations and aesthetic comfort and habitat. I should explain the later. I love being in a room filled with books. I love bookshelves; in the kitchen, the toilet (yes) in my car, in corridors, in corners of rooms, on top of shelves, in stacks next to chairs, with circular coffee stains on the cover – I hate when that happens, it hurts, but it after a while, I smile…. Books are to be used, they are meant to be read, over and again. There have been times when I have been woken, in the middle of the night, by bulky books in my bed, under the covers. I love being surrounded by books. I love people who read books and, yeah, if someone does not read books, chances are I will not spend much time with them. During one year, a decade ago, I spent time with a family, and enjoyed reading to their son before bedtime every night.

Back to the iPad. It is heavy and delicate. A heavy book can be plonked down almost everywhere; a heavy iPad, not so much. It has to be a dry, stable surface or GUDUCRASHHHHHH! A book I can read in the bathtub. An iPad not. A book I can read in a coffee shop, or restaurant, or down the pub. If I did that with an iPad I would feel like a Berkshire Hunt. I don’t have to recharge a book. I can leave delightful little post-it notes in books. Make annotations, not just ‘notes’ in the margins. Once, someone gave me a jasmine blossom; in a most memorable gesture she stuck it in a button hole of my jacket. I kept it in one of my books for more than 15 years…

I have several pdf papers loaded on the iPad. Perhaps ten or twenty times more than I do, books, but I cannot make notes or highlights on the documents. I also cannot organise them into categories or reading lists, the way I could on the first Kindle device I owned.  While all of this is frustrating, perhaps the worst thing about the iPad is that it is part of the acquiesced monopoly that Apple products represent.

If you want to buy music, you need to do it through iTunes. If you want to buy movies – iTunes. Applications, iTunes. If you want to download photographs from your DSLR, you need to buy adapters from Apple. Oh, and don’t travel to Western Asia, South East Asia, Istanbul and Central Europe (as I have over the past six months) if you have a device registered in South Africa. I have an iTunes account registered in the US, an email address that was first created in the UK. Sometimes I receive messages that apps I want to buy are not available in ‘the South African store’. The delivery address and the billing address in my US account are different, plus the account is linked to a credit card, which means delivery to where I live, in South Africa is almost impossible…

The frustration never ceases. Apple forces you into an envelope. They want your life to be ordered and structured according to their preferences and dictates. Your email address, billing address, residential address and physical presence have to be aligned. It gets worse. If you actually own an iPad, just using it is a pain in the bottom behind. If you want to transfer files between devices; both have to be Apple. The key board is too small, and if you have worked on a ‘normal’ key board for most of your life, it is enormously frustrating. Sure, some might say you can buy a wireless keyboard. Well this just turns the iPad into a laptop – in several pieces. I love my Toshiba laptop much more than I do, the iPad. Non-Apple devices have USB ports – transfer, download, connect way! And they are cheaper. I don’t think I will buy another book for my iPad. As a way of checking email, wasting time on social networks, the iPad is fine, beyond that, it’s just a lovely gimmick and a device for making you look socially cool. That’s not a good reason to buy Apple!

A Glimpse of What Journalism’s Future May Look Like

A glimpse of a  more complete skills-set for early 21st Century journalism

A glimpse of a more complete skills-set for early 21st entury journalism

By Ismail Lagardien

I have often been asked by students what I thought about the future of journalism. My response was almost always the same. It went something like this (I copied the following passage from an email message I sent to one of my students in 2009):

“We are in the midst of significant social, technical and historical change. I don’t know what news gathering and reporting will look like in 15 – 20 years from now, or whether the very idea and practice of the actual craft will change; whether it will become something completely different from what it has been for most of the 20th century…. What I will advise you, is to come to grips with the technology and with the ethics of the current revolution in the media. Journalism has always been technology-based, it has become even more so, now.”

My views have not changed much over the past few years. In fact, the uncertainty about the craft – especially its ethics, standards and the very ideational basis of journalism – as we have known it for most of the past 100 years, has deepened, significantly. What I will say, now, is that more than ever, the craft will be shaped by its technology. The successful journalists, not necessarily the highly rewarded ones (Hell, Thomas Friedman of the New York Times is well paid and, yet, he is the cynosure of what is wrong with celebrity journalism – and anyway he is simply an odious person) will be the ones, who successfully integrate their storytelling (text and image) with new technologies. I have, also, discovered what I think the future journalist may well look like.

She has initiative, is highly motivated, courageous, versatile, creative and engaged; she has taken all the relevant knowledge that is available and immersed herself into it, and built a profile that gives significant insights into what the future of the craft may look like. Her name is Heather Billings. (See her website).

I am sure she is one of very, very many, but as an exemplar, Billings seems to have situated herself at the cusp of where I think the future of journalism lies. Now, this does not mean that everyone who wants to be a successful journalist should acquire all the skills that she has; there was no need, for instance, for reporters (historically) to be good photographers or sub-editors or headline artists. For instance, if you were a good writer, that was considered to be sufficient. Newspapers and magazines have always been put together by groups of people each with different (sometimes vastly differing skills). A sub-editor may not have a sense of what makes news, but have impeccable grammar and know what may (legally) be published. A photographer may make a picture which s/he thinks is aesthetically and technically brilliant, but an editor might need something that would look better, or that may sell the story.

In all my time as a journalist, I was average in all categories and remained average, while some of my peers excelled at one or the other, and went on to do rather well as writers or photographers. Nonetheless, I suspect that in the future, the broader skill-set you have may more directly influence overall accomplishment(s). Ms Billings’s portfolio may well point to where the future of journalism lies – at least in terms of its practicalities. The social, including ethical, and historical dimensions are a much more difficult discussion.

Memory and Photography

Digitised from an old black and white negative. Blouberg Strand Beach, Cape Town.

By Ismail Lagardien

I think I have, now, fully embraced digital photography. This does not mean that I have accepted it as ‘better than’ film. It simply means that I have stopped hankering for the time when we used film. In fact, one of the very  few conservative tendencies I do have is that I prefer black and white photography; of course, digital technology provides for this….

Anyway, it has been exceptionally difficult to shed my love of film. Over the three or four years since I sold my last film camera, the sturdy and reliable Nikon F5, the transition has been difficult. At times I have felt like a luddite, other times I have felt helpless; increasingly I have come to accept digital photography as presenting enhanced opportunities for expression through photography. With increased use of phone apps, especially Instagram, I have, now, engaged this helplessness. There has also been a contiguous transition. I have become increasingly interested in the philosophy of  photography, and the contribution of photography to visual sociology - the use of photographs, film, and video to study society and the study of visual artifacts of a society. I have also become interested in the interplay between photography and memory. These interests started when I began to digitise hundreds of negatives that I had held in storage for many years; most of which I placed on my photography blog.

One particular set of pictures (see this link) inspired the idea to write a book-length photo essay on the lives of women and children, captured in the images. Through a rather fortuitous set of circumstances and events – not quite meaningful coincidences – I read a newspaper report about a picture I made in August 1985, in which an activist was beaten by the police. In the report, published more than two decades later, the activist, now a respected member of the ruling elite in South Africa, recalled the events and seemed, to me at least, to have a different set of recollections from my own. (See picture, below)

When reading the report, I recalled the time when the picture was made, and the months that followed the event. At about the same time, I was digitising a series of pictures that I made in Wuppertal, an old missionary station in the foothills of the Cederberg Mountains (my favourite part of South Africa), and started writing down my own recollections of the period – using the pictures as mnemonic devices. What I hope to emerge from these recollections is the journey that took me to Wuppertal, the people I photographed – especially the women and children – and photograph them again, now more than two decades later, and tell their stories of how their lives have changed. (Any publishers willing? Tafelberg?)

Work pressures and other projects make it difficult to get away any time soon. I will, nonetheless, turn to the project in 2013, and try to locate the people whom I photographed in the mid-1980s. As it goes, the brother of one of the young girls captured in the Wuppertal series came across the pictures and has placed me in touch with his sister, who is now, herself, a mother.

In the meantime I continue to explore the relationship between memory and photography – to the extent that I would like to establish an institution for the study of photography and memory. South Africa has a very large and very vibrant media community. I suspect I will not have much difficulty attracting people to display, exhibit and discuss their work and, perhaps, teach. Memory Studies is a growing interdisciplinary academic subject with at least one specialised academic journal. See, also, the New School’s webpage on Memory Studies. All of that is, however, for another time. In four days’ time I leave for Istanbul where I will attempt to capture aspects of the city on film. Well, on digital media. At the moment I am trying to figure out what, exactly to focus on over the week that I will be in Istanbul. I am particularly interested in the idea of intentional hybridity – the conscious fusion of different languages and styles set against each other dialogically. Just how to capture that in a photograph remains hard to figure out. Maybe I will simply write about how Istanbul differs from Dubai, which I visited a few months ago and wrote about, here.

Some references and readings 

Parker, Faranaaz, 2010. “Politics chose us”. The Mail & Guardian. 6 August. Available at http://mg.co.za/article/2010-08-06-politics-chose-us. Accessed on 9 December 2012.

Canepa, Matthew (ed), 2010 ‘Theorizing Cross-Cultural Interaction among the Ancient and Early Medieval Mediterranean, Near East and Asia’  ars orientalis volume 38. Full journal can be downloaded from Academia.edu

See, the book, Globalisation and Culture: Global Mélange, by Jan Nederveen Pieterse. This is a blurb for the book:

This seminal text asks if there is cultural life after the ‘clash of civilizations’ and global McDonaldization. Internationally award-winning author Jan Nederveen Pieterse argues that what is taking place is the formation of a global melange, a culture of hybridization. From this perspective on globalization, conflict may be mitigated and identity preserved, albeit transformed. The book offers a comprehensive treatment of hybridization through a series of innovative conceptual tables that are bolstered by textual analysis and compelling examples from around the world. In a new chapter, the author explores East-West hybridities – the idea that globalization is a process of braiding rather than simply a diffusion from developed to developing countries. This historically deep and geographically wide approach to globalization is essential reading as we face the increasing spread of conflicts bred by cultural misunderstanding.

Plan for a better future needs backing to succeed

By Ismail Lagardien

It is often easy to become pessimistic, or even fatalistic, about South Africa. It is also hard to escape the fact that there are, sometimes, valid reasons for such pessimism and fatalism… What seems exceedingly difficult is to plan for and (actually) establish a better, more prosperous and stable country in which there is a high level of trust among citizens. The National Planning Commission (NPC) report is the latest, the most ambitious and, arguably, the most coherent and widely accepted strategy to help establish such a country. (Read Further)

Technology, Language and Culture – Some Very Simple Thoughts at the 20th Anniversary of the Text Message

The first text message, saying ‘Happy Christmas’, was sent by Neil Papworth on 3 December 1992. It took another three years before text messaging took off; by 1995, people were sending an average of one message a month. In 2012, by one estimate, 4.1 billion text messages are sent every day. So pervasive, and culturally assimilated have ‘texting’ become that in some countries people with phones can contact emergency services by text message, and emergency warnings can be relayed to cellphones. How has this changed our lives and how we understand our world? Some not so deep thoughts.

 By Ismail Lagardien

25 November 2012. Most people who have computers and mobile phones, especially those of us who have dedicated our lives to some form of communication through texts or images, go through some pain each time there is a new technological advance with the instruments we use in our craft(s) or that aid our means of expression. It is difficult to avoid the seduction of new technologies…. Progressively, over, time as we acquire new technologies, we leave behind routines and practices and adopt new ways of communicating. And so we have moved, over the centuries, from carving messages on clay, stone, papyrus, wax or paper, relaying messages by telegraph, radio, television and, today, on or through computers. In this process of change and technological progress, we may be losing something….

Throughout this process, from representing our life stories orally to writing them down, there has been a great flourishing of cultures and knowledge production. In ancient civilisations, from around 30 000 BCE, across the world, knowledge and information became increasingly available and, in various permutations, most people learned how to communicate by the most widely use means. We may have reached a point in this late capitalist period, howver, where the pervasiveness of computer technology – and the attendant culture of ‘present-mindedness’ and, the spurious claim that, ‘if you’re not online, you’re irrelevant’ and unhitched, therefore, from contemporary knowledge production and cultural reproduction – has stripped us of the ability to record, reconsider and reflect upon our lives, our beliefs and values, without having to ‘plug in’, ‘log on’, ‘enter’ or ‘register’ a ‘’user name’, submit credit card details, etc

While this idea that ‘if you’re not online, you’re irrelevant’ is, of course, terribly narrow-minded and self-serving, it certainly is true that more and more people in the world are learning about the world (and about themselves!) through computer technology; on PCs, tablets and mobile phones. I have no doubt, and fully understand, that technical advances alter the way we perceive the world and very means and manner in which we communicate with one another and the world. There are, however, two issues that I have wrestled with: One has become somewhat of an obsession, the increasing exclusivity of computer technology, and the other – the process of digitisation and how it transforms traditional human skills, sensibilities and even our anatomy….

In terms of the former, for most of the past thirty years, or so, personal computing devices have allowed us to store information at hand; on ‘storage drives’ in our homes, places of work or in libraries. Cloud technology, surely a new device to draw rents from users, may render ‘hard-drives’ or ‘storage drives’ out of our personal space. Knowledge will be ‘out there’ – exactly where, the end user may not know, but one thing seems clear, it is becoming increasingly impossible for this knowledge to be universally accessible. We can’t trade books as freely as before; you need a device. You can’t write AND make new knowledge available to the public; you need a device and access to the internet and a place to store the knowledge and whoever wants to gain access to the knowledge needs a device, access to the internet and, possibly an ‘account’ that provides access to the knowledge…. All of this costs money.

There was a time – and we should not be too nostalgic, hysterical or alarmist about this – when almost anyone could go to a village square to listen to a village elder or an oracle; read or write scripts by hand and send or receive notes and messages. Increasingly, however, we need computers and computer technology – all of which costs money. If you’re an Apple user, chances are you’ve acquiesced to the company to monopolise an important part of your life. This acquiesced monopoly may mean that everything you do on a computer or online has to go through Apple, or iTunes….

Anyway, the second issue that has bothered me has less to do with computers per se, and everything to do with technological change. About six or seven years ago, I asked a teenager to read and tell me the time on my wristwatch – which was lying on the desk where he was doing his homework. He couldn’t, he said. This kid was/is bright. He is the youngest son of my dearest of friends who gave their children a fantastically liberated upbringing. Yet, the kid could not read an analogue clock. His world was digital… Much earlier, I took a set of exams (statistics, econometrix or mathematics – can’t remember which one it was), and did everything on computer. At one point, I think it was during a statistics class, I reached for a pen and paper and decided to work out a problem ‘by hand’. Even earlier, I took a final exam for my Master’s degree, and wished I could do it on a computer.

You see, I learned to use a computer for writing quite early. Although I spent most of my childhood in relative poverty – without electricity sometimes and sometimes without indoor plumbing – I entered journalism in my early twenties and wrote my stories on an old ‘mainframe’ computer (I still don’t know what that means). By the time I returned to graduate school, I had the ability to type fast and move paragraphs around without using a mouse…. Writing a long essay on critical political economy by hand is hell; if you change your mind or try to re-arrange your thoughts you’re screwed. Kind of.

Then this week, something came across my ‘desk’ (though one of my feeds) about the ‘dying of cursive’. More and more kids, these days, are unable to write by hand, to the extent that there is a movement to preserve cursive writing skills among children in the United States. Is this a bad thing, that our kids cannot write by hand? I don’t quite know. As one associate said: He couldn’t be bothered; it’s like hankering for the horse and carriage or an abacus! Another associate said he continued to rely on his note books and pens. A third wrote the following passages:

“I remember learning cursive. Definitely horse and carriage stuff. In Romania, in 1961, when I started 1st grade, we started by learning cursive. There were no ball point pens; but there was an inkwell shared by every two students and a metal nib pen that you had to dip in the inkwell every other word. Using these implements, we had to learn more than cursive: we had to learn calligraphy. Every upstroke was thin; every downstroke was thick. There was to writing a rhythm and a flow. It was not just a matter of learning to write; it was a matter of learning to write beautifully. 

So there is this about learning to write cursive: it imprints upon the mind and the body the notion that beauty matters and that it is part and parcel of writing. Long before one is able to write anything interesting or beautiful, when one is barely stuttering writing-wise, it is possible to put some form of beauty in writing. This is very important. 

The question of efficiency is more complicated. I have earned my living as a professional writer for all of my adult life, and I grant that being able to write on the computer, unconcerned with mistakes, is liberating. It was wonderful to write the final draft of my dissertation (especially footnotes) on a computer; it is also wonderful to write programming books and technical manuals on a computer because they require hundreds of revisions, and having to do that on a typewriter, or by hand, would be utter hell. On the other hand, both for my dissertation and for writing conceptual material that has to be pellucid and flowing, it was best to do the first draft long hand, because it is the easiest way to slow down and give my writing the voice that makes the reader trust me. 

Losing the fear of making a mistake is a great thing when writing is a chore; but not such a good thing when the matter of writing needs to percolate and steep and get to the point where the voice in your head starts dictating the words you need to take down. When you know that mistakes matter, or rather when you know that the stakes are high, you don’t start before you’re ready. Of course, even then, there will be revisions, but they will be revisions of something that is whole. 

I have on my bathroom wall a copy of a manuscript page from Tolstoy’s “Resurrection,” his last book. Every single line is crossed out and rewritten. I keep it there to remind myself how much work writing is, even for Tolstoy, even on his last book. Some time from now, when writers are all churning out stuff on the computer, there will be no more manuscript pages like that. Oh, I know that there are programs that let you see deletions and updates and edits, but it won’t be the same. Scholars might care, assuming the electronic evidence remains, but no one will be framing those pages and putting them up on a wall.”

But we are all adults. How many children, especially in the highly developed countries, are learning to write by hand, today?

Some people think that writing in cursive is good for brain function, co-ordination and motor skills; that it ‘connects’ people to the past and that it is ‘a symbol of personality, even more so in an era of uniform emails and texting’. Early in my brief academic career, I had to warn students not to use text language in (typed) essays and (hand-written) exams, after finding that their grammar, syntax and diction was really poor. I, too, am guilty of shortcuts and ghastly bad grammar and spelling when I send email or post notes on social networks; hell, I have never appreciated the work of sub-editors more than today, when I write things for my blogs and ‘stuff’ creep in….

Nonetheless, it is text messaging, I believe, that is ripping language up. Here I have to slip in something that may seem contradictory! I love language. The language I speak and write most fluently is English. Because it is my second language, I try, everyday, to improve. But, and this is an important ‘but’… I also believe that language is and should be dynamic; it can and should be appropriated and then redeployed in any way that people around the world would like to…. Text messaging is, however, my biggest nightmare. I would estimate that 90 % of my daily telephonic communication is by text messaging. The conspiracy of predictive text to destroy friendships aside, I try to always avoid crude abbreviations, like ‘GR8′. I use the popular ‘lol’ but I am always concerned that someone would think I mean ‘lots of love’ instead of ‘laugh out loud’…. but all of this is besides the point!

The point I am trying to make, albeit with great difficulty because I love computers and cameras, is that we are losing what I think are important (writing and language) skills; intimacy (I no longer call a friend to ask how his children are, I simply check out his Facebook page. We no longer discuss football, we have a fantasy football league, and if I want to know something about a player I go to Wikipedia!). In general, we are increasingly placing access to knowledge out of the reach of people on computers behind pay walls and firewalls, and in ‘clouds’.

Computers are also changing us anatomically. The positions of our heads, and strain on our necks from reading books are different from when we read computer screens. But this is way to complicated for me ….

Alas, I need an upgrade, and that new Nikon is a killer! I don’t need it. I do. I don’t need it. I do. I want it. I do.

International travel is not all it’s cracked up to be….

Note: I wrote this piece a while back. An edited version was published by Travelwrite, an online South African travel writing magazine a year ago. This is the extended version.

Two Emirates Airline planes on separate runways at Dubai international airport. (Picture with Instagram)

By Ismail Lagardien

I hate flying. I have read all the statistics about the probabilities of being killed in a car crash as opposed to a plane crash. I have read bumper-sticker psychologies about having “control issues” and about my “fear of dying”, and after all these years of flying I have learned some “tricks” about where to sit on a plane to avoid or minimise turbulence, what not to eat or drink in order to “make the flight more enjoyable”….

I hate flying. The pedant may say that it is not really rational, that it is a phobia, because flying cannot kill you. My response is this: I hate being in flight. Every time the plan engine splutters I think I am dying. Every time I hear an unfamiliar sound, or a slight jerk or shudder (it has been more than 30 years since I first flew across the Atlantic, I think I know what a smooth flight sounds or feels like) I think I am dying. So, I hate flying. None of the advice helps. Every time I fly, I tremble, sweat and curse in stoic silence.

Maybe there is some validity in the charge that I have “control issues”. Yes. I do have a huge problem with being strapped down, sealed in a tin can flung into the air and told everything will be alright. If planes are so safe why do they go through the routine – before every take-off – of telling us what to do in the case of “an emergency landing”. Maybe I am afraid of dying. Yes. I haven’t had a novel rejected yet, so I’m not ready to die. Besides, death is fine, but I don’t want to have someone dig through the collection of dirty pictures on my computer storage drives.

I’ve heard or read all the advice. Turbulence, forget about it, I have been told, it happens. Learn to deal with it. The best place to sit for a smoother ride, I am told, is over the wings (but that’s where most of the fuel is stored!); the safest place to sit is at the back, because that part more readly remains intact in the case of a collision with a mountain face, but it’s the worst place to sit because you feel every bump, and that’s where the toilets and kitchens are! I wouldn’t take a table in a restaurant next to the toilets or the kitchen; why would I do it in a cramp space where the crapper is next to the kitchen?). The front of the plane tends to be the most stable. Well, here’s the problem. That’s where the pilots sit. That’s where First Class is. I am not allowed to sit there. Oh, yeah, the cockpit and first class are also the first to hit the mountain. Someone once told me that a seat over the wings comes with a terrible view. Really? When I am strapped down in a seat, flung into the air, with a mouth-breathing travelling salesman sitting beside me telling me his life story, I am hardly concerned with beautiful sunsets or puffy clouds. I am thinking about throttling the travelling salesman. I’m thinking about dying! There is, of course, also, the “pre-flight” horror; an ordeal of epic proportions, which, in the grand scheme, is superseded only by the terror of the suburbs – if you know what I mean

From the minute I make the reservation to a week after flying, I go through an ordeal of fear, irritability, insomnia and sometimes very serious constipation. I am, at best, an irritable, irascible, snob (not the wealthy elitist kind) who hates people – I prefer ideas. I hate carrying heavy bags. I hate people wanting to help me carry my bags, and then hover around for a tip after they have just crushed my books or my laptop or, heaven forbid, my cameras. There is little glamourous or even exciting, to me at least, about international travel.

There is even less thrill in having to sit beside someone who, wearing a loud patterned shirt tucked into blue jeans with matching belt and shoes, a cell phone clipped into his belt (all very earnestly) telling you his life story and showing you pictures of his wife and children. Everyone always looks so happy in those pictures. Perfect, almost. They’re usually dressed in matching clothes with white sock and running shoes. Once, on a flight from Reykjavik to Minneapolis, I sat though a travelling salesman’s story of how much “bonus” he was expecting to “make” that year because he worked so hard. He explained that he was away from home “on average, I’d say, six days a week”, but had a week off “over fourth of July week and a week over Christmas”. His voice trailed off into the drone of jet engines. I caught up, again to hear the technical details of a new pressure hose he had bought to clean his “deck and drive”… that he wanted to buy a pontoon boat… that he made “the best bulgogi in the world”… [something about] “the good lord” and being ‘blessed”. He was a nice man. Nice people are why I wear dark glasses on long-distance flights. So I can either pretend to be asleep, or pretend that I am listening, or pretend to not notice when they give me a look that says: “Hey, we’re going to be sitting next to each other for seven hours, let’s be friends”. Headphones and sunglasses on flights are clear warning signs that say: “Don’t talk to me. Don’t even as ask how my day is going.” If the words “fuck off” mean anything to you, you will leave me the fuck alone – before I let it rip.

I can’t bear people constantly fidgeting and tugging at their clothes or their hair. I hate it when they imagine that being squashed together in a tin craft that is sent into the air is enough reason to tell me their life stories. The grating sensations start before check-in, when you have to lug heavy bags up and down stairs across platforms, in and out of elevators through revolving doors, up and down curbs. When your life revolves around books, your bags tend to be heavy. By the time you get to the check-in line you’re filled with bile. I can’t bear the tedium of standing in lines. I feel captive and exposed moving step-by-step, through the maze of ribbon that guides you this way, then that way, then back this way towards the person at check-in who, you always wish, had discretionary powers or sympathy. Standing in line, shuffling forward and backward, then sideways in the maze, there is always a woman wearing a floral shirt and very tight-fitting denim shorts (or a man wearing a Harley Davidson T-shirt with the words “the bitch fell off” written on the back) with running shoes and white socks (it’s always white socks) who imagines some solidarity in suffering from standing in line for what can take hours, and who would insist on telling you how funny it was that you always end up meeting, again, as the line ambles through the maze towards check-in. I say a silent prayer, each time I stand in the maze: Please god of the skies, don’t let this person be seated next to me. S/he would just try to consolidate to the imaginary solidarities we share….

Once you get to the front of the line there is trepidation, angst … you feel guilty for something you know you have not done; you don’t quite know what it is that you have not done, but you feel accused. The person at the check-in desk has been standing on his or her feet all day. Their haemorrhoids have been blazing and itching, in-grown toenails and fungi have been fucking with their feet, and through it all they have had to smile. They have had to take a toilet break to scratch the itches and dab their haemorrhoids, gently, with moistened toilet tissue, and apply shark oil. Back at the check-in desk, they take your passport. Look at the picture. Look at you. Then back at the picture. Standing before them, at their mercy, you feel guilty . You know your bags are too heavy. You know they’re going to charge you for excess baggage. You know they’re going to ask the size of the bag you’re carrying on. (Who keeps those kind of details around, anyway?)

Hate is a strong word, but I really do hate everything to do with international travel. I never fly when I can travel by surface. There really is nothing as stable, predictable and straightforward as a train ride. I have flown into airports in the remotest parts of the Africa; where the wrecks of previous attempted landings a reminders of what can go wrong. Competing with cows, dogs and people, I have bounced onto landing strips in Great Amazonia, after a fly-by of Angel Falls. I passed out from fear when our plane was fired at with SAM missiles over Angola. I passed out when a small plane landed in the sea at Santos Dumont Airport, while we were taxiing before take-off for New York City. Once, while flying over the Midwest of the US, I called my dear friend AGRB in South Africa and told him: “I am about to take a shit on this flight. Please, when they find my body with a toilet seat wrapped around my head, don’t tell them I died doing what I enjoyed most.” I really hate everything to do with flying.

Having said all that, travelling from South Africa by land or sea to hear the din of La Vucciria, catch the Arsenal at home or take a walk along the Arbat might take a while….

Dubai: Somewhere Between Disappearance and Appearance

Dubai skyline at sunset. Picture taken with Hipstamatic app for iPhone. Copyright Ismail Lagardien

 By Ismail Lagardien

(Note: This is my first take. I misplaced a notebook. I may update this post)

I read somewhere, a long time ago, in a book-length photographic essay on New York City, that in order to best photograph a city and capture its essence, it was important to either know the city very well, or not at all. I never tested that claim…. I recently spent two days in Dubai. Although my intention was not to photograph the city, I came to see the city, as it were, through some of the images I made. There were two things that stood out in Dubai: The way in which the country, the United Arab Emirates, seem to have, for now at least, “conquered” nature, and the liminality of the city, of its people and its social relations. Two days is not enough time to draw any firm conclusions about any city, least of all one as dynamic and emergent as Dubai, but there are, to be sure, no limits on what may be discussed or thought.

City on a Threshold Between Disappearance and Appearance

There is an overwhelming sense of liminality that you get in Dubai. It is not quite an interregnum in the Gramscian sense (one would have to do much more than empirical observations over two days), but in the sense that society, at least the dominant group, those who “belong” seem to have abandoned many of the rituals – as well as the routines and repertoires – that previously ordered their social relations, but have yet to fully make the transition to wherever it is that they are heading. In this sense, Dubai sits on a threshold that separates the earlier period from the new, which (new) rituals are battling to establish.

Advertisement for women’s underwear in the Burj Al Khalifa Mall. Picture taken with Instagram for Android. Copyright Ismail Lagardien

Like Hong Kong in an earlier period, Dubai has (successfully) experimented with cultural self/re-invention and inserted itself into late capitalist globalisation as an international space, less as than a particular place – where the latter suggests a sedentary, fairly stable, existence and the former a more open field in which agents and social positions (and identities, for that matter) are located then constantly negotiated and renegotiated. Consistent with Ackbar Abbas’ concept of “disappearance,” which he applied to help understand the culture of Hong Kong, Dubai represents the dialectic that emerges from the push/pull of disappearance and appearance. To establish itself as an international port and insert itself into a putative global political economy, both cities had to, at least nominally, renegotiate indigenous cultural identities and become global or international cities. The old had to disappear and the new appear. In both cases there emerged a particular cultural space defined by “floating identity” (what I describe as a liminality).

Dubai Cityscape. Like a scene from a Ridley Scott film. Picture taken with Hipstamatic app for iPhone. Copyright Ismail Lagardien

In Abbas’ work, Hong Kong’s peculiar lack of identity is derived from its status as “not so much a place as a space of transit,” where the inhabitants consider themselves as transients and migrants from somewhere on the way to another place. In Hong Kong, media saturation changes the experiences of space to the extent that it becomes abstract dominated by signs and images that dispel history, reconfigure memory and attempts to define presence.

In Dubai, if you cast your gaze above the street level, the city is (stated here somewhat contradictorily) a post-modernist anonymity in which structures, tall buildings, compete with each other and conspire to appear, hyper-real as it may be, as something “other than,” something new, something less local and more global, as the tiring cliché would insist. The city that gleams in the desert sun – not the older parts of Dubai, which unavoidably seems to linger in Edward Said’s Orientalist imagination as the “exotic” other – represents the modernist imaginaries which presage the reconstruction of urban spaces into hyper-realities and geographies of global capitalism with its attendant divisions of physical, emotional, intellectual and cultural labour. What emerges is, then, a stark postmodern city, that is, at once, unable to shake the divisions of labour that are inherent in capitalist organisation of society. Post-modernists may cringe at the thought that class or labour divisions remain a defining feature of late capitalism. Nonetheless, under these condition, the (human) worker is a foreign import (a thing), that builds and maintains the physical and social structures of post-modernity, while remaining alienated from the product of his/her labour.

Worker: Building the City. Copyright Ismail Lagardien.

Coming in to land, over the barren desert, the first images of Dubai are of neat lines, of roads that link what seem, at least from the air, to be multiple towns or cities, somehow disconnected, but linked by wide multi-lane highways. Here is a city, you realise, where the car is a central feature of social relations, in the sense that access to the gleaming city in the distance is restricted to those who can afford a car.

Coming in to land. The neat rows of homes and roads on the outskirts of Dubai. Picture taken with Instagram app for Android. Copyright Ismail Lagardien.

“We have many cities, in Dubai,” the Bangladeshi taxi driver explains as we hurry along the pristine roadways between the airport and my hotel near the World Trade Centre.

“We have media city. Internet city. Health city… I live in poor city,” he says.

Passing by one building that is part of the world trade centre, he says: “Concrete cancer”.

“Excuse me. What was that?” I asked.

Pointing to a building on our right, he said: “Concrete cancer. That building is going to be demolished. The sand they used [to build it] had too much salt. It is now eating up the concrete. Concrete cancer.”

The driver points out how clean Dubai is, “not like India or Bangladesh; like Singapore”. Singapore, that other city that invented itself and inserted itself into the global political economy as an international city. Indeed, Hong Kong, Singapore and Dubai may, perhaps unfairly, be described (mutatis mutandis) as the generic cities of late capitalism, in the sense that they were created as spaces reserved as functional entrepôts, the nodes of global political economic activity. To describe them as generic may seem unfair (although generic refers, in Abbas’ terms, to the functionality of capital, low production costs and attempts to place architecture outside the realm of other social values), because aesthetically the architecture of each city would seem different. But architecture is both a form of artistic expression and part of the social world with its attendant social relations; architecture is, therefore, not just drawing or engineering. It is, also, not just construction; it is also the creation of social spaces and forms of expression situated at the interface between functionality and signifying or communicating.

Cityscapes, therefore, tell stories about the people who live in them and, perhaps more so, about the people who designed and erected the structures that make up the cityscapes – notwithstanding the fact that, at the outset, buildings tend to serve functional roles. However, in the same way that a spoon serves a functional role, it also denotes a certain way of eating and signifies that way of eating. Architecture, Umberto Eco wrote, can and ought, thus, be placed within specific (and general) cultural contexts. Dubai’s late capitalist period skyline represents some incarnation of a futuristic world in which its inhabitants acquiesce to eternal displacement and corporate nomadism. Parenthetically, it may be purely by co-incidence, or irrelevant, that some of the pictures I made in Dubai (see the picture at the top of this post) reminded me of scenes from the Ridley Scott film, Blade Runner.

Humans Against Nature

Standing tall over the cityscape, Burj Khalifa, the tallest human-made structure in the world, symbolises something of a pinnacle of possibilities among skyscrapers, all of which provide context and meaning to the people who live and work in Dubai. Seen from the sky, it glistens in the haze like a shard of glass in the desert sand. Down below, on the other side of the city along parts of the banks of the waterway that runs through Dubai, there is a riot of colours, cars, bicycles, carts and workers, invariably migrant workers, and open markets with shoppers and hustlers, noises and smells and the general detritus of human activity. In the gleaming, glistening part of Dubai consumers shop in air-conditioned malls.

In the older part of the city, along the waterway, they shop, barter and truck in more familiar open spaces; in hot and steamy streets, alleyways and squares where men (always men, it seemed) sit or squat, sometimes feet-up, sometimes barefoot – with their slippers placed beneath their carts – in spaces designed for more intimate human interaction. You have to go where the working class dwell (in this case, immigrant workers who build and service the city) to see people undressed, as it were, and uninhibited, on foot, on bicycles and on benches – sitting and talking, smoking, and doing what people have always done, communing more intimately and casually than in the gleaming skyscrapers of the new, emergent, more liminal city across the water….

Water.

In some ways, Dubai represents the perennial contest between humans and their social and natural environments. As humans, we can’t fly so we build planes; we can’t move at high speeds or carry heavy loads over long distances, so we build cars, trucks and trains; we can’t survive extreme weather, so we manufacture clothing and build shelters; we can’t readily drink all the water we find, so we purify that which we can capture; we can’t stay out in the sun for lengthy periods, so we cover our eyes with sunglasses and protect our scalps with hats; we can’t physically prevent mass human migrations (not without resorting to violence and injustice), so we produce laws and police borders to coral, discipline and control, and in the post-modern “generic city” we don’t build the physical structures in which we dwell, nor, it seems, are we able to produce, for consumption or nurture and protect ourselves – so we ask other humans to do it for us….

Taking a ladder somewhere. Picture taken with Hipstamatic app for iPhone. Copyright Ismail Lagardien

There is no hiding the fact that Dubai is built in the desert, and deserts are water-scarce and, well, hot for most of the time. It seems almost trite just to say that. In the battle between humans and their natural environment, between Dubai and the water-scarce desert, humans appear to have won. As a show of force, of accomplishment, of humans over nature, there are elaborate fountains and so-called water features almost everywhere one goes in Dubai – especially in the glistening-gleaming part of the city.

Water feature in the international departures lounge of Dubai international airport. See picture of fountain in Burj Al Khalifa Mall, below. This picture was taken with Instagram app for Android.

From the gentle bubbling brook in the airport departures lounge, to the large water parks, Wild Wadi and Atlantis (such irony) artificial islands “reclaimed” from the sea… There is water, everywhere. The water parks, it seems, are purpose built for tourists; on the far end of the city, in the Al Souk al Kabir and especially the Historic Bastakiya, water seems more precious. It was ironic, actually, that the receptionist at my hotel did not know where or what the Bastakiya was… Anyway, in the Al Souk al Kabir and Meena Bazaar (where the migrant workers, mainly from South Asia) live, the streets are bustling.

Whereas in the new part of the city, where the skyscrapers mark the cityscape there are more cars on the roads than people on the sidewalks, in the Meena Bazaar and Al Souk, there are people on foot, on bicycles, pulling or pushing carts – or simply milling about. There are, also, very few tourists here. Here the waterbody that runs through the city is precious; river taxis, what seem like house-boats, in various states of disrepair, criss-cross the water or line parts of the banks. Here there is graffiti on the walls. Here you find workers sitting on sidewalks, drained by the heat; others continue to chisel and work away, sweat sealing shirts to their backs – their eyes face the ground in anonymity.

Workers hammering. Picture taken with Hipstamatic app for iPhone. Copyright Ismail Lagardien

In the shiny part of town, humans have, for now, won the battle against the unrelenting heat with airconditioning, which places significant pressure on electricity. On the hottest days of the year, the United Arab Emirates channels up to 60% of its electricity consumption for cooling buildings. With the expansion of economic activity over the past 30 years, electricity demand in the UAE has soared.

In the Meena Bazaar, people use a lot more passive cooling; they simply spend a lot more time outdoors. The discovery of oil in the 1950s ushered in a dramatic shift in building patterns, away from the traditional old design and construction methods, towards more European models. This shift was, in part, to accelerate nation building, but also because of a lack of local design professionals, and the influx of foreign professional who had little knowledge or insights into local climatic conditions and building culture. Knowing, now, that architectural design and urban planning produced unsustainable demands on energy, there is a slow movement underway in the UAE to start looking at the country’s own architectural heritage and historical methods of passive cooling.

Worker taking a break from the intense heat in the Historical Bastakiya District of Dubai. Picture taken with Hipstamatic app for iPhone. Copyright Ismail Lagardien

Before the spread of 20th century liberal capitalist orthodoxy to the region, the UAE, like most areas outside the European world, relied heavily on community, for both social and environmental protection. For instance, in the UAE, traditional towns were usually clusters of inward-facing houses, some with shared courtyards. (The next time I visit Dubai I shall stay in a guesthouse in the Bastakiya, and not in one of the airconditioned skyscrapers! On this journey circumstances made it so that I had to stay in a hotel among the skyscrapers in the modernised part of the city.)

Al Diwanya Guesthouse in the Historical Bastakiya District, Dubai. This is where I will stay the next time I visit the city. Picture taken with Hipstamatic app for iPhone. Copyright Ismail Lagardien

In terms of traditional cooling systems, historically, houses were connected via narrow pathways, which typically ran north to south, creating shaded areas, reducing heat gains, and benefiting from prevailing winds. These urban design patterns meant residents could walk in relative comfort during the harsh summer months. Traditional architecture also used wind towers that rose above the roofs of buildings, and opened to all directions. These towers provided ventilation and passive cooling by capturing wind and channeling it through narrow shafts into interior spaces. Buildings also benefited from high thermal mass building material, which protected the interior from increases in outside temperature and solar heat gain, making the interior easier to cool passively. The preceding passages on passive cooling are based on the work by Carboun: Middle East Sustainable Cities. As the government of the country continues to grapple with the soaring cost of battling the heat, Dubai continues to grow and fascinate.

Divers of the Waterfall at Burj Al Khalifa Mall. Copyright Ismail Lagardien

Photography teaches you to look at the same things that others look at, but see them differently. It helps you see more, or less than what you look for, often that which affirms our prejudices and sensibilities…. Dubai was all at once surreal and hyper-real, but none of this could conceal the fact that the place was deeply divided socially, culturally, in the division of labour and in the battle of humans against nature. In the “new” part of the city airconditioned skyscrapers and cars outnumber people. In the old part of the city, there are more people than buildings and cars. Two days were not sufficient time to see the city and “capture its essence” through a lens or otherwise; and anyway, essence is so terribly defiant a concept…. I would need more than two days to reach any firm conclusions.

Thanks to CJ for helpful suggestions, which I used to make some changes.

Banner Images

Some of the colour images that appear in the banner of this blog are from a series of pictures I made of street art in South East Asia. Below is a selection of these street art pictures. The ones below were made with a phone using the Hipstamatic app. I also made a set of the same wall art images with a Nikon DSLR. The black and white image that comes up in the banner, sometimes, is of the ceiling fans in one of the ubiquitous street food/curry houses in Kuala Lumpur.